۱۳۹۷ مهر ۸, یکشنبه

Iran mullahs threaten striking truck drivers with execution, arresting dozens of drivers

he Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
Iran Uprising - No. 210

The nationwide strike of the truckers, which has entered its second week, has intensified the crisis inside the clerical regime whose leaders have been horrified from its continuation and spread. In this regard, Khamenei sent Chief Prosecutor General Montazeri to the scene to threaten the strikers to execution. Montazeri said: "According to the information we have, in some routes, some of the cities, there are elements who are provoking some of the truckers, or possibly blocking them and creating  problems for them. They are subject to the rules and regulations of banditry and the punishment of the bandits according to the law is very severe, sometimes resulting in the death penalty. "(News Network TV News – September 29).
At the same time, Ali al-Qasimehr, the chief justice of the Fars province, accused the strikers of "corruption on earth," and IRGC Brigadier General Mohammad Sharafi, one of the commanders of State Security Forces, threatens the protesters with harsh action. (State TV - September 29).
However, two days earlier, the Fars Province Transportation Director General had called the strike of truck drivers as rumors and said: "It's been a few days that rumors about truck drivers’ strike have been circulating in the media and cyberspace. This misuse of the opponents from the needs of the truck drivers to create crisis in the country is clear for every Iranian (FARS, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps news agency, September 27).
IRGC Colonel Kavos Mohammadi, a deputy of the Fars provincial police force, described the strikers as "disrupters of the order," and said: "Following the disrupting acts of some of these people on the roads of Fars ... After the visible and invisible patrol of officers, 22 thugs and disrupters of public order on the roads were arrested and, after filing a case, they were sent to the judiciary authorities and through them to the prisons. Police will deal with sensitivity and vigilance with the smallest insecurity factors in coordination with the judiciary, and the process of confronting with the disrupters of order and security of the roads and axes of Fars province will continue on a daily basis. The police monitor and control all the roads in this province, visibly and invisibly, and resolutely deal with all elements of disrupters of order and security in these areas "(IRNA news agency - September 26).
Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the Iranian Resistance, saluted the strikers throughout Iran, describing the vindictive threats of the clerics against the dignified and hardworking drivers as a reflection of the growing crisis of the clerical regime, and said that the ruling mullahs were the biggest bandits in the history of Iran, and that they neither want nor can respond to legitimate demands of striking drivers. She called on all human rights organizations to take action to release the arrested and urged the general public, especially the youth, to support the strikers. She added that realization of these demands is only possible with the establishment of democracy and people's sovereignty. A regime that threatens to execute its working people due to a strike must be rejected by the international community.

Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran
September 29, 2018

۱۳۹۷ مهر ۱, یکشنبه

Washington Times Reveals The Iranian Regime’s Fake News Against The MEK

Washington Times reveals the Iranian regime’s fake news against the MEK
Over the past several weeks, agents and mercenaries of the clerical regime led a dirty campaign against the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) under the guise of reporters from Britain’s Channel 4 and Al-Jazeera English.
After running campaigns by Channel 4 (September 6) and Al-Jazeera English (September 16) to discredit the MEK on behest of the Iran regime, the regime’s Foreign Minister, Javad Zarif, and the regime’s Ambassador to the United Kingdom, Hamid Baeidinejad, called for the closure of the accounts of the supporters of the Iranian Resistance.
It is ironic that a representative of a regime which deprives 80 million Iranians of social networks, gives instructions to close down the internet accounts of its opposition – an act which reveals the regime’s fear of the growing popular unrest as the intensified international sanctions are looming.
In addition, it clearly shows that the disparaging campaigns broadcasted by Channel 4, and Al-Jazeera English were “ordered” by the mullahs’ regime.
One has to recall that recently, Facebook, Twitter, and Alphabet (Google’s parent company) found multiple social media accounts and websites that formed part of an Iranian campaign to covertly influence public opinion in favor of Iran across the world by sharing content from the Regime’s state-run media.
SO Their remarks are further proof that the fake news, aired via these programs were a vengeful repetition of the mullahs’ claims against the Iranian Resistance and aimed at diverting the attention from the regime’s cybercrimes and the closure of its fraudulent social media accounts. In 2002 and 2003, this regime claimed through hired mercenaries and journalists that Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction were hidden in the PMOI’s headquarters. The goal then was to divert attention from the Iranian Resistance’s revelations about the regime’s clandestine nuclear facilities.
The National Council of Resistance of Iran issued a statement and disclosed Al-Jazeera English, and the disgraced regime’s agents such as Trita Parsi, and his associate Azadeh Moaveni. The statement also reveals how on September 6, Channel 4, had secretly filmed the MEK residence and sent photos and videos to the regime’s intelligence agents.
MEK
MEK new camp in Albania
Mr. L Todd Wood, the columnist of Washington Times and the Editor-in-Chief of Tsarism website, on a recent business trip to Albania visited the MEK’s new camp and wrote a report that reveals the fake news spread by the Iranian regime, which reads:
“In fact, I was given a tour of the camp. The facilities are very functional, if not somewhat barren. With the MEK children having been brought out of Iraq to Europe and America in the last decade, the remaining adult members are all mostly older, although I did meet scores of a new generation of MEK, male and female, some of whom were in the group of children who were evacuated from Iraq in 2009, only to join the MEK later in life. Many signed up in their relatives’ footsteps, to keep alive their struggle against the regime.”

۱۳۹۷ شهریور ۲۶, دوشنبه

Iran’s IRGC chief saber rattling about threats

IRGC chief Mohammad Ali Jafari making ridiculous claims about the Iranian regime’s missile capabilities
Analysis by PMOI/MEK

Iran, Sept. 14, 2018 - The Iranian regime’s state-run Tasnim news agency, associated to the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) Quds Force, covered the bogus remarks made by IRGC chief Mohammad Ali Jafari, aimed at lifting the spirits of the Iranian regime’s forces.
“Today, having a large number of precision ballistic missiles with a range of 2,000 kilometers provides an unprecedented capability for the Islamic Republic of Iran. Our nation, relying on these powers and the capability of our dependable forces, are able to stand in the face of global arrogant forces,” he said.
It is worth noting that international experts are debunking and ridiculing such claims.
“Those who have bases, troops, and equipment within 2,000 kilometers of Iran’s sacred soil should know that all of the IRGC’s missiles are very precise… the IRGC’s recent revenge of terrorists sent a very meaningful message to our enemies, especially superpowers who believe they can enforce their devious objectives upon us,” Safavi added.
Of course, a few hours after the mullahs’ claims of targeting Iranian Kurdish dissident groups using precision-guided missiles from inside Iran, military experts debunked Tehran’s claims by showing how the mullahs’ actually launched their missiles from inside Iraq at a range of about 20 kilometers.
The Iranian regime’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) claimed responsibility for a recent missile attack targeting Iranian Kurdish dissidents based in Iraq. This missile barrage on the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) site coincided with the execution of three Kurdish political prisoners early Saturday morning local time in Gohardasht (Rajaie Shahr) Prison of Karaj, west of Tehran.
The IRGC statement claims the objective was to end “aggressive measures against Iran.”
“The missile unit of the IRGC Air & Space Force, in cooperation with the IRGC Ground Forces Drone Unit, targeted a group’s base and the session on Saturday with seven short-range surface-to-surface missiles,” the statement adds. 

KDP statement
The KDP issues a statement on mullahs’ vicious crimes saying the KDP Political Office base came under an IRGC aerial attack while the party’s Central Committee was holding a session. The KDP restated that when facing an increasing wave of domestic unrest at home and international political/economic pressures, the Islamic republic regime resorts to the crackdown, aggression, crimes and terrorist measures against freedom lovers of Kurdistan and Iran inside the country and abroad.
15 KDP members were killed and nearly 40 others were injured, the Kurdish dissident group specified in another statement. Four KDP Central Committee members, including Karim Mahdavi, Ebrahim Ebrahimi, Nasrin Haddad, Rahman Pirouti and two life-long members of the Central Committee, Soheila Ghaderi and Hashem Aziza, were among those killed in this missile attack. 

Iranian Resistance condemnation
Iranian opposition President Maryam Rajavi strongly condemned the execution of three Kurdish political prisoners and the missile attack launched against the Kurdistan Democratic Party by the mullahs’ regime, describing these measures as crimes against humanity and called for immediate measures by the United Nations Security Council.
Mrs. Rajavi called on the people of Kurdistan and all of Iran to rise in uprisings and protest.
“I call on the courageous people of #Kurdistan & across #Iran to rise up against the anti-human mullahs’ regime that is hell-bent on stepping up terror, repression, executions, and missile attacks to extinguish the people’s uprising. But it will take that wish to the grave,” Rajavi said in a tweet.

۱۳۹۷ شهریور ۲۴, شنبه

A deeply troubling social crisis in Iran

Abandoned children are suffering from the reign of the mullahs.
Analysis by PMOI/MEK

Sept. 13, 2018 - One of the many tragedies the Iranian society is suffering from during the reign of the mullahs is the rising number of abandoned children. While facing an uncertain future, these children are abandoned in a variety of public places. The majority of them fall victim to a large number of malign social crises plaguing Iran.
The rising numbers are mind-boggling. Through the course of 2017, a total of 181 children were taken in by the Children Welfare Organization in Alborz Province, northern Iran.
According to the deputy of social affairs in the Welfare Organization of Khorasan Razavi Province of northeast Iran, one child is abandoned each day in the city streets or even the local holy shrine. Mashhad has the highest average rate of abandoned children throughout Iran, the official adds.
Over 580 babies were admitted to the special section of this entity in 2017, according to this same source, all abandoned or ill-treated by their parents.
Every day five abandoned babies are admitted to the special babies centers, according to the Tehran Province deputy of social affairs.
In the city of Isfahan alone, authorities are admitting 16 abandoned babies each month.
True statistics are obviously far beyond these numbers provided by the regime’s official sources.
The former director of welfare issues in Iran’s Ministry of Interior says around 950 to 1,000 babies under the age of three are abandoned each year in Iran. The Welfare Organization then becomes responsible for these cases. Many other babies are literally sold because their parents are too poor to afford to raise them. There are no official records and statistics on this increasingly troubling phenomenon.
The dark reality is that these babies’ parents, living in poverty, are so desperate that they are left with no option other than abandoning their newborns, hoping a children welfare society takes them in or they are adopted by families able to provide care for them.
Head of Iran’s Social Trauma Society also considers poverty as the root cause of this dilemma. These babies’ families cannot afford their very basic needs and cannot even afford the cost of an abortion.
These abandoned babies/children face uncertain futures under a regime that has no plans on how to protect them. The government-run hospitals refuse to take in or provide treatment for any children whose parents are poor and not able to pay for their treatment. This leaves a large portion of Iran’s population deprived of health care, especially for their children.
The province of Isfahan is now witnessing this crisis reaching a critical point. All the while, the more deprived provinces of Kurdistan and Sistan & Baluchistan are experiencing even worse conditions.
There are, of course, no records on the increasing number of children being sold and purchased. Many such children fall victim to a mafia-like network, ending up living the life of crimes or even being traded for harvesting their body organs.
At the end of this disturbing spectrum, regime officials and their inner circle enjoy living luxurious lives. The so-called “aghazadeh” (loosely translated into the offspring of nobles) enjoy highly-equipped kindergartens or are sent to European and American schools.
A regime-affiliated website described these kindergartens with indoor heated swimming pools, multi-purpose gyms and sports centers equipped with rock climbing walls, ice skating rings, ballet classes, chess clubs, English and French classes, music courses and much, much more facilities. These are all for children under the age of seven.
The report adds one such facility is located in Zafaranieh of northern Tehran, charging 12 million rials a month, while another kindergarten in Saadatabad charges 10 million rials a month and a third such example, located in western Tehran, costs 6 million rials a month for each child.

۱۳۹۷ شهریور ۱۶, جمعه

A primer on the history of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran

Mohammad Hanifnejad Saeid Mohsen and Ali Asghar Badizadegan
By PMOI/MEK

Anyone who remembers Iran in the 1950s and 1960s can attest that it was an era marked by severe repression against the dissidents and political activists. After conducting the 1953 coup against Dr. Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran’s popular Prime Minister who nationalized the country’s oil industry, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran’s monarch, had forced all opposition groups and movements into silence and submission. Through his brutal secret police, the Savak, Pahlavi had established an iron-fisted rule.

The first members of PMOI/MEK hail from circles of young intellectuals and academics

It was under these circumstances that on September 6, 1965, three Iranian intellectuals, Mohammad HanifnejadSaeid Mohsen and Ali Asghar Badizadegan, founded a new opposition movement that later became the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK), the principal and longest-standing Iranian opposition movement. The trio were inspired by the authentic interpretation of Islam that rejects all forms of fundamentalism, which had previously been the dominant interpretation of the religion in Iran and set severe social and political restrictions on people, their freedoms and their right to express their beliefs.
Since its founding, the PMOI/MEK was opposed to the atheist/Muslim conflict that the fundamentalist mullahs of Iran were promoting. Hanifnejad and the other founders of the MEK stressed that the real conflict was not between faiths but between the tyrants (the Shah regime) and the oppressed (the people of Iran, regardless of their faith and ethnicity).
Staying true to these principles, which were unprecedented in the Iranian history, the founders of the MEK embarked on a long journey to establish freedom and democracy in their country. And they paid a heavy price to defend the rights of their people, setting an example of persistence and loyalty that is still admired by Iranians across the globe to this day.

 

1965-1969: The beginnings of the MEK

From 1965 to 1969, the founders of the MEK were focused on recruiting new members and creating a network of elite cadres that could lead the movement through the hard times that would come. Their conviction was that the struggle for freedom is a science, and they must study it and acquire it to be able to succeed where their predecessors had failed. To this end, they engaged in thorough studies of all philosophies and doctrines to glean everything that could help in their struggle. After thorough examination and studies, Hanifnejad and his comrades eventually chose democratic Islam as the ideology that could best serve the aspirations of the Iranian people.
The founders of the MEK had also concluded that the fight for freedom and democracy can’t be a part-time job that one engages in during their free time. That’s why they were focused on recruiting people who were willing to dedicate their every hour to help advance the organization’s goals. The first people to join the movement were young intellectuals and university students. Among them was Massoud Rajavi, a young student who would later become pivotal in shaping the organization’s future.

 

1971: The crackdown on the MEK and the execution of its leaders

During the winter of 1969, the PMOI/MEK started to form a network of activists that could start taking concrete action against the Shah regime.
In August 1971, while the Iranian monarchy was preparing for its much-advertised festivities to celebrate its longtime rule, the Shah ordered a widespread crackdown on all opposition groups and individuals that could prove problematic to the ceremonies, in which several head of states were scheduled to attend.

The members and leaders of PMOI/MEK become widely known in society for their defense in the military courts of Shah, in which they defy the ruling power and its corruption
The members and leaders of PMOI/MEK become widely known in society for their defense in the military courts of Shah, in which they defy the ruling power and its corruption

Subsequently, the Savak arrested and incarcerated more than 80 percent of MEK’s members, including all of its leaders. This was a very hard strike against the nascent organization, but it also leads to the recognition and popularity of the MEK among the Iranian people. The defenses of the MEK’s leaders in the Shah’s military courts, in which they defied the regime’s power and exposed its corruption, became especially popular among the Iranian masses, who were directly feeling the oppression of the Shah regime in their daily lives.
The stories of the MEK’s resistance in Shah’s prisons and courts circulated among Iranians by word of mouth, and soon the organization managed to garner a solid and widespread base of support in the Iranian society, among all walks of life.
Hoping to defuse the growing threat of the MEK for its regime, the Savak proposed to Mohammad Hanifnejad, who had been sentenced to death, to publicly repent his struggle to avoid execution. Hanifnejad and the other leaders of the MEK refused to turn their back on their ideals and their dreams for freedom and democracy, for which they made the ultimate sacrifice. On May 25, 1972, Shah’s regime executed Mohammad Hanifnejad, Saeid Mohsen and Ali Asghar Badizadegan.
Of all the leading members of the MEK, only Massoud Rajavi was spared. He was saved from imminent death thanks to an international campaign by his brother, Kazem Rajavi. Kazem, who was a renowned jurist and politician in Switzerland, rallied several organizations and politicians to intervene and pressurize the Shah regime to revoke Massoud’s death sentence. Among those politicians was Francois Mitterrand, the leader of the French Socialist Party and the future-to-be President of France. Under heavy international pressure, the Shah regime was forced to reduce Massoud’s sentence from death to life in prison.

 

1975: A failed coup within the ranks of the MEK

In September 1975, the MEK was still recovering in the after the Shah dictatorship executed most of its leadership cadre. Of the elite members of the MEK, only Massoud Rajavi remained, and he was isolated in the dungeons of the Shah. During this period, a separatist Maoist group tried to change the ideology of the MEK and hijack its name and emblem.

Majid Sharif Vaghefi, a senior member of the PMOI/MEK, assassinated by separatists in 1975
Majid Sharif Vaghefi, a senior member of the PMOI/MEK, assassinated by separatists in 1975

To drive its point and further its goal, the separatist group went as far as intimidating and oppressing MEK members who remained loyal to the organization’s true mindset and ideology. The separatists murdered Majid Sharif Vaghefi, one of the senior members of the MEK outside of prison who refused to accept their twisted ideology.
The turmoil virtually tore the MEK apart, and it was only thanks to the efforts of Massoud Rajavi that the organization was brought back from the brink. Massoud issued a 12-point declaration in the fall of 1976, in which he reasserted the true foundations of the MEK’s ideology and its principles. The declaration became the basis for all the members of the organization to stay true to the organization’s aspirations and goals.

 

 

The 1979 revolution

In the final years of the 1970s, a series of escalating nationwide protests started chipping away at the power of the Shah regime, which previously exuded absolute control over the country. The regime started to yield under the pressure of the demonstrators, who demanded political freedoms and the release of political prisoners.

A banner brandished during the 1978 anti-monarchist demonstrations calling for the release of political prisoners, including Massoud Rajavi and Moussa Khiabani
A banner brandished during the 1978 anti-monarchist demonstrations calling for the release of political prisoners, including Massoud Rajavi and Moussa Khiabani

On January 20, 1979, Massoud Rajavi and other leading members of the MEK were released from Shah’s prisons. The MEK then assumed an active role in the protests that shaped the 1979 revolution, whose slogans were the very things the MEK had fought for since its founding and its members had made sacrifices for. Merely a month later, the monarchy collapsed, and a new era began in Iran. Since the Mojahedin had spent most of the months that led to the 1979 revolution in prison, the mullahs, under the guidance of Ruhollah Khomeini, took advantage of the vacuum to take control of the situation and seize the country’s power.

1979-1981: Peaceful protest against the religious fascism of the mullahs



Less than two years after the 1979 Revolution, the PMOI/MEK become the largest political movement in Iran (Massoud Rajavis speech at the University of Tehran)
Less than two years after the 1979 Revolution, the PMOI/MEK become the largest political movement in Iran (Massoud Rajavis speech at the University of Tehran)


Since the rise to power of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the fundamentalist dictatorship, the MEK constantly warned against the abuses of the new regime, including the repression of women, minorities and all opposition forces. As the main defender of freedoms, the MEK quickly built up an expanding base of support in the Iranian population, especially among young people and intellectuals. In less than two years, MEK became the largest political movement in Iran.
However, during these two years, Khomeini’s regime continued to sink the country in a merciless religious dictatorship that spared neither women, nor students, nor minorities. In the same period, Khomeini’s henchmen murdered 70 members and supporters of the MEK during peaceful rallies, meetings, and protests.
On June 20, 1981, the MEK tested the democratic environment a final time by launching a demonstration to remind the Khomeini regime of its responsibilities to respect the fundamental freedoms of the Iranian people. In Tehran, more than 500 thousand people attended the demonstration, which hadn’t been publicly declared in advance.
In response, Khomeini ordered the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), his personal army, to open fire on the unarmed and peaceful protesters.

 

Post-1981: The dark terror of the Khomeini regime and the founding of the NCRI

On the morrow of the June 20 demonstration, the Iranian regime launched a ruthless crackdown against all opposition forces, especially the supporters and members of the MEK. The regime’s forces chased and executed many of the Mojahedin’s members in the streets, and thousands were dragged into the regime’s prisons, where they were subjected to inhuman tortures and were later executed. Women, children, elderly—no one was spared.

The regime’s executioners did not spare women, children, or elderly—photo of a young, 18-year-old MEK member shot after being tortured (1981
The regime’s executioners did not spare women, children, or elderly—photo of a young, 18-year-old MEK member shot after being tortured (1981


Following the banning of all opposition forces, the Khomeini regime executed and murdered some 120 thousand people, most of whom were affiliated with the MEK. In Khomeini’s prisons, his guards and executioners resorted to the most vile and brutal tortures. Khomeini’s fatwas give his torturers free rein to do anything they want to torment the Mojahedin, including rape, severing body organs, gouging eyes, etc. On some accounts, the regime’s guards extracted the blood of MEK members before executing them so they could use it for the own medical needs of their own guards and soldiers. Pregnant women were tortured and executed. Young girls were raped before their execution. These are just some of the brutalities that the Iranian regime imposed on MEK prisoners.
Under these circumstances, on July 21, 1981, a month after the beginning of Khomeini’s reign of terror, Massoud Rajavi founded the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), a coalition of all opposition forces that aspired for replacing the religious fascism of Khomeini with a democratic, pluralist and secular state. A week later, on July 29, the leaders of the MEK exited Iran with help from the brave and freedom-loving officers of the Iranian Air Force. Rajavi took refuge in France, from where he continued to lead the struggle for freedom against the Iranian regime.

 

The MEK and the Iran-Iraq war

In 1980, when the Iraqi army occupied parts of the Iranian soil, the MEK were quick to take up arms and defend their homeland. But as soon as the Iraqi army released its hold on Iranian land and retreated back behind international borders, the continuation of the war was no longer justified and the Mojahedin were also quick to call for peace between the two countries. Meanwhile, Khomeini insisted on continuing the war until the overthrow of the Iraqi government and the establishment of another religious tyranny identical to his own in the neighboring country. The war provided Khomeini with the perfect pretext to suppress the demands of the people under the excuse of being at war and cracking down on all opposition forces by accusing them of weakening the government and colluding with foreign enemies.

Iran-Iraq war kills millions on both sides, while peace is achievable
Iran-Iraq war kills millions on both sides, while peace is achievable


On September 10, 1982, Massoud Rajavi met with then–Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz in the NCRI’s Paris headquarters and signed a peace agreement with the Iraqi government on behalf of the MEK and the Iranian people. The move proved that peace can be achieved, and it’s the Iranian regime’s fault that the war is being prolonged.
The MEK’s peace effort quickly garnered international recognition and support and was endorsed by 5,000 politicians from 57 countries worldwide.

 

1985: The rise of women in leadership roles in MEK

In the six years that had followed the 1979 revolution, the female members of the MEK had proven that women were at the forefront of the all-out resistance against the religious and misogynistic rule of Khomeini. Eventually, on March 10, 1985, women found their true place in the ranks of the Mojahedin when Maryam Azdanlou (Rajavi) became the co-secretary general of the organization.

On March 10, 1985 Maryam Azdanlou (Rajavi) is named co-leader of the PMOI/MEK
On March 10, 1985, Maryam Azdanlou (Rajavi) is named co-leader of the PMOI/MEK

The event marked a turning point in the history of the Mojahedin in its struggle against the fundamentalist ideology of Khomeini, which was especially harsh toward Iranian women. It was the conviction of the Mojahedin that if women are the primary victims of the Iranian regime, then they should be given a privileged status in the MEK’s ranks, which is the nemesis of the mullahs’ rule in every way.

 

1986: MEK relocates to Iraq

On June 7, 1986, under pressure from the French government, which was deeply engaged in dealings with the Iranian regime, Massoud Rajavi left France for Iraq, where he founded the National Liberation Army (NLA) on June 20, 1987. The NLA became a major force against the Iranian regime.

The Iranian National Liberation Army (NLA), in which women play an active role, has carried out a hundred assaults against the Khomeini armed forces
The Iranian National Liberation Army (NLA), in which women play an active role, has carried out a hundred assaults against the Khomeini armed forces

The MEK predicated its installment in Iraq on preserving its independence and the non-interference of Baghdad in the politics and operations of the Iranian Resistance, a condition that was agreed upon in bilateral negotiations with the Iraqi government.
The NLA engaged in hundreds of assaults against the military of the Iranian regime. On July 25, 1988, the NLA launched its largest operation, called “Eternal Light,” in which it targeted the entirety of the Iranian regime. The Iranian regime suffered 55,000 casualties, and on its part, the NLA lost 1,304 of its officers and soldiers, heroes who laid down their lives for the freedom of their country.
Middle East analysts and observers attributed Khomenei’s acceptance of the ceasefire with Iraq in 1988 to the efforts of the NLA.

 

1988: the massacre of MEK members and supporters in Iran’s prisons

On July 28, 1988, the Iranian regime began a mass purge of its prisons from political prisoners, executing anyone who refused to repent their opposition to the rule of Khomeini. In the span of a few months, the regime’s executioners sent more than 30 thousand prisoners to the gallows. This was a genocide, a crime against humanity without precedent, which became known as the “1988 massacre.”

At least 30,000 Iranian dissidents, most of them affiliated with the PMOI/MEK, are executed in prisons in 1988
At least 30,000 Iranian dissidents, most of them affiliated with the PMOI/MEK, are executed in prisons in 1988


The plans for the massacre began months earlier, as Khomeini became worried of the future of his regime and his tenuous hold on power. Under the pressure of the advances of the NLA and knowing that the quasi-end to the Iran-Iraq war would strip his regime of its most efficient weapon against opposition forces inside Iran, Khomeini was adamant on wiping out any individual and group that could organize protests and political activities against his regime in the post-war era.
Khomeini himself issued a fatwa, in which he explicitly ordered the execution of all political prisoners who don’t renounce their ties to the “Nefaq,” a term his regime used for the MEK. Groups of clerics were sent to prisons across Iran to carry out minutes-long trials for prisoners and seal their fate if they remained steadfast in their beliefs. The judges, which the regime had called “clemency commissions,” became renowned as “the death commissions.”
The sheer cruelty of the regime’s executioners, contrasted by the sheer passion of the MEK members and their dedication to the principles of their organization, caused a rift at the highest echelons of power in the Iranian regime. While murder raged in Iran’s prisons, Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, the heir-apparent to Khomeini, wrote a letter to the Iranian regime leader, protesting against his decision to execute so many people in such a short time span. Khomeini, who would do whatever it takes to preserve his regime, deposed Montazeri and forced him into house arrest.
When Khomeini died in 1989, Ali Khamenei, then-president of the Iranian regime took his place. Khamenei made sure Montazeri remained in house arrest and marginalized until his death in 2009.

 

The 1990s and 2000s: The policy of appeasement

During the 1990s, western states engaged in a new drive of rapprochement toward the Iranian regime, hoping they could preserve their economic interests and avoid the obvious threats emanating from Tehran. Naturally, it was the Iranian people and the MEK that paid the price of this failed policy.
In 1997, the U.S. administration, under the presidency of Bill Clinton, inserted the Mojahedin into its list of foreign terrorist organizations (FTO) as a goodwill gesture to Mohammad Khatami, the newly appointed president of the Iranian regime, who presented himself as a “moderate” and “reformist.”
European states replicated the U.S.’s move in 2002 and designated the MEK as a terrorist organization in an effort spearheaded by Jack Straw, then-foreign minister of the United Kingdom. Straw was known for his endorsement of the appeasement policy toward the Iranian regime, an attitude that made him much detested by the Iranian people inside Iran and abroad. Canada and Australia followed suit.
The beginning of the appeasement policy triggered a wave of political and military pressure against the MEK and the Iranian resistance, resulting in the suffering and deaths of many innocent people. The bombing of MEK camps in Iraq during the 2003 U.S.-Iraq conflict, the coup-d’état of July 17, 2003, against NCRI headquarters in France, and the numerous raids and rocket attacks against MEK camps in Iraq were just some of the gifts that the policy of appeasement and its orchestrators delivered to the Iranian regime.
Having been through many trials and ordeals during their decades-long history, the Mojahedin were not intimidated by the show of power of the Iranian regime and its foreign cohorts. They engaged in a legal battle that lasted more than 15 years and resulted in the victory of justice and truth.
In 2009, the European Union removed the MEK from its list of terrorist organizations. In the years that followed, the U.S. judiciary declared that the MEK had been wrongly designated as a terrorist group and in 2012, the U.S. State Department removed the label. Canada and Australia also removed the MEK from their lists shortly after the U.S.

 

2016-2018: MEK’s relocation to Albania and

In 2016, while the Iranian regime and its Iraqi proxies were trying to exterminate the MEK in Iraq, an international effort led by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, the president-elect of the NCRI, succeeded in relocating all members of the organization to Albania. The event was a major achievement for the MEK, whose members could now redouble their efforts in leading the struggle for freedom in Iran, and a major defeat for the Iranian regime, whose existence depended on destroying its main opposition.

https://image.mojahedin.org/images/2018/201832017835388416675_40.jpg
In 2016, an international effort led by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi succeeded in relocating all members of PMOI/MEK from Iraq to Albania

The Iranian regime continued to find itself in a precarious position as it started losing its international supporters while at the same time the networks of MEK supporters and activists continued to expand inside Iran. In December 2017, protests erupted across Iran over economic grievances, government corruption and the suppression of freedom. MEK’s resistance units played a major role in keeping the flame of resistance alit and preventing the regime from suffocating the voice of protesters.
As a result, the protests continue in every city and corner of Iran, and protesters are calling for the overthrow of the Iranian regime, a goal that the MEK and NCRI have been striving for since 1981. As the mullahs’ regime inches toward its inevitable collapse, the MEK, which has been through countless trials and tribulations, thrives and aims to fulfill the dreams of the Iranian people.